Netcraft release a snide article today sniggering that apple.com stayed available following the release of the Mac Mini, whilst the Windows 2003 powered MacWorld Expo site failed after Steve Job's keynote address. Why the comparison boys? You have no idea if MacWorld Expo has the same bandwidth, web server count, load balancing and switch setup as apple.com has. You could be comparing a couple of Windows 2003 boxes to Apple's rather large server cluster running apple.com; you're also ignoring the fact that Apple hosts their images on Akamai's edge servers. When slashdot starts sticking up for Microsoft then you really know that your fud is a low blow.